The Writerlad Journal

Random rants and writings by Kevin Yong

Retro Review: X-Men #1 (1963)

Note: This will be the first of what I hope will be an ongoing series for this blog. That is, reviews of older classic titles that I’m “discovering” for the first time. In this case, it’s Marvel’s first issue of the X-Men.

40 Years of X-Men DVD-ROM setA few years back, I splurged to purchase a set of the Marvel DVD-ROM collections featuring complete runs of various series in PDF format. The Fantastic Four, Avengers, X-Men, Captain America, Spider-Man, the Hulk… I think the only sets I missed were Iron Man and Ghost Rider. I’m not particularly a fan of reading comics on the computer screen; I think ink on paper is much easier on the eyes. Also, I think the visual storytelling of the comics (in terms of panel layouts, pacing of page turns, etc) suffers when the onscreen display dimensions don’t match the original format the comics were designed for. On the other hand, these scanned collections have their advantages: $50 for a DVD collection equaled out to perhaps 10 cents per issue on a collected print run of a title, and it’s much easier to store all these series of comics on disc, as opposed to having them bagged, boarded, and boxed in the closet. These scanned PDF versions gave me an easy way to read hundreds of comics that I would never otherwise be able to afford, providing “reading copies” of entire series that I had always heard about but never actively collected.

I confess that I’m not much of an X-Men fan. Around the time when I was actively collecting comics in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the X-Men franchise had become for Marvel what the Legion of Super-Heroes franchise had become for DC: a cult favorite superhero title with so many layers of character continuity and long-running subplots that it had the reputation of being impenetrable to new readers. And since I had neither time nor resources to invest in reading hundreds of issues of backstory, I tended to avoid the X-Men and all its related spinoffs.

But now, with DVD-ROM in hand, I have decided it is time for me to start from the beginning and try and get a sense of what all the fuss was about, not just for the X-Men but for the early “Marvel Age” of comics in general. I’ll start here with X-Men #1, but I’ll be moving on through the rest of the DVD-ROM sets as well. No promises that I’ll make it all the way through these collections anytime soon, but I’ll do what I can to record my progress on this blog for anyone interested to see a somewhat jaded comics reader taking a trip down memory lane to discover the early days of Marvel Comics for the first time, from the very earliest issues.

Cover art for X-Men #1 © MarvelThe X-Men #1 (link to GCD index page.)
Cover date: September 1963
Credits: Stan Lee & Jack Kirby
(Copyright: © Marvel Comics, all images used for review purposes only)

The story: As an introductory story, this works great. A few brief captions are all that’s needed to provide an “origin” for the heroes — that is, there’s no cosmic rays or alien rockets or magic rings, these characters simply have mutant powers because they are born that way. The story starts at the heroes’ headquarters, where we meet Professor X giving a training lesson to the four X-Men (Cyclops, Angel, Beast, and Iceman), and then later we see the arrival of the new recruit Marvel Girl. With all the heroes introduced, we then shift over to the villain of the story: Magneto. As he takes over an army base and all its weapons, the young X-Men are sent on their first mission to save the world from Magneto’s ambitions.

The X-Men in actionWhat worked in this story: Stan Lee and Jack Kirby together, that’s what worked! If viewed in the abstract, this could be considered a fairly generic “new heroes fight powerful villain” story with melodramatic stock characters if anybody else had written or drawn this. Yet the dynamism of Jack Kirby’s art, and the sheer enthusiastic energy of Stan Lee’s scripting make me willing to accept the characters and the concept. The combination of their art and writing just grabs me as a reader and pulls me along for the ride so fast that I never have a chance to stop to notice any of the odd story quirks along the way.

What kind of quirks, you ask? Well, here’s a few panels that seemed odd during my second read through…

Verbosity overflow: The “Marvel method” of scripting (in which the dialog is only scripted after the basic plot outline has been drawn) allowed Lee & Kirby to create some masterpieces, but it can also have its flaws. This might be the case of a writer being too wordy, or an artist not allowing for enough space, or a combination of both. But regardless of the cause, I pity the poor letterer who was stuck trying to make this panel work…

I have said too much.

Comic book science: Time for a quote from Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland: “Alice felt dreadfully puzzled. The Hatter’s remark seemed to have no sort of meaning in it, and yet it was certainly English.”

Speed-seeking Coldness?I had to stop and read this panel three or four times: “As the… missiles are attracted by heat, so are the Iceman’s ice grenades attracted by the missiles’ speed…” This sounds as if it’s being offered as some sort of scientific explanation, and yet… huh? Coldness is drawn to speed? Really? I don’t understand, and yet… I see it happening right there on the page, so I guess it must be true. Who am I going to believe, common sense or my own two eyes?

Odd choice of words: I’m really curious about future X-Men issues now. Was this an accidental typo, or did Stan Lee really intend to redefine “teleportation” to mean “telekinesis”. And if so, then what word will he use later to describe someone who actually has the power of teleportation?

That word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

Final thoughts: Apparently the theme of “downtrodden heroes hated and feared by the world” which I now associate with the current X-titles would come later. Here in their first adventure, the military is cooperative in letting the X-Men take care of Magneto for them, and by the end they appear to be sincere in their gratitude after the victory. No complaints from me; given the gloomy grit of modern superhero comics, I can appreciate a good old fashioned happy ending.

All's well that ends well.

San Diego Comic-Con 2010 (Belated)

cci2010_walkingdeadWell, it’s been a few weeks now since the San Diego Comic-Con (or, technically, “Comic-Con International: San Diego”) and I guess it’s finally time for me to quit procrastinating and write up my report on the show. (Note: This is a slightly modified version of the report I also posted to the CCAS social network, and to my ‘trib in the Alpha-Omega APA.)

Sorry for the delay! In addition to the usual sleep deprivation and sensory overload that accompanies the convention (making the “Walking Dead” banners throughout the convention center very appropriate), I also managed to catch a nasty cold on the last day of the show so by the time I got back home, I was feverish and coughing and was pretty much wiped out for the next two weeks. By the time I was back on my feet, so much other work had piled up while I was sick that my intended convention report got pushed back yet again. So… before anything else can go awry, I’m getting this report written up and posted!

BACKGROUND

For those who might not know, the annual “Comic-Con International: San Diego” is a world-famous comic book convention that has grown to encompass all areas of pop culture. From Wednesday evening to Sunday afternoon, the event regularly draws over 120,000 attendees to the San Diego Convention Center, offering panels, workshops, and a massive exhibit hall that combines the enthusiasm of costumed fans, the innovation of entrepreneurial self-publishers, and the promotional glitz of big media studios. The entire city gets in on the act, to the point where even the public transportation system turns Klingon…

cci2010_gaslamp1 cci2010_gaslamp2

I have been attending the convention for well over a decade now, not just as a fan or as an independent publisher, but also as part of an outreach ministry of the Christian Comic Arts Society. Our group’s involvement with the show was more important than ever this year, as the infamous Westboro Baptist protesters tried to stir up publicity by picketing the convention. Sadly, the media coverage of their protests tended to overlook the other side of the story, which is that the real “True Believers” were not outside the convention as angry picketers, but rather were inside, as Christians who are comic book readers, creators, aspiring amateurs and established professionals. We come from all corners of the industry and represent a growing movement to encourage Christian involvement in the arts, and a vision for using the art of comics to promote the cause of Christ.

The CCAS has been actively participating at the San Diego convention for almost 15 years. Our convention activities include hosting tables at the exhibitor hall and organizing panel discussions and workshops. We had roughly a dozen volunteers helping us in our ministries this year, and had resources sponsored by religious publisher David C. Cook to help promote their upcoming Action Bible with art by award-winning artist Sergio Cariello.

PERSONAL THOUGHTS

The convention itself has my usual complaints: it’s simply grown too large. It often took me over an hour to move from one end of the hall to the other, or to travel from one panel discussion and back to our table. As a result, I spent much less time at our table than I had planned to, because most of my time was spent trapped inching my through crowds trying to even reach our table. The size of the crowds, the noise, the claustrophobic gridlock in the aisles… it’s all too much for me. I keep coming back each year as an exhibitor as part of this volunteer outreach ministry, but there’s no way it would be worth it for me to come as a “fan” anymore. Not unless I was coming just to camp out to grab exclusive movie studio swag.

On the other hand, the “feel” of the show was not as oppressive as in previous years. I remember just one or two years ago when almost every table in the small press aisle seemed to be offering some sort of blood-soaked vampire or zombie book. Entire aisles would be nothing but a sea of gloomy black and red banners. This year’s offerings were much more diverse, with everything from funny animals to mystery to historical drama to comics for girls. Not that I have anything against the horror comic genre per se, I just like seeing more variety in such a big show as San Diego.

But overall? It was a good convention for the Christian Comic Arts Society ministry. Our panels went well, our table sales were exceptional (considering the circumstances), we met a lot of new Christian friends, and we gave away many tracts as well as all of the Action Bible samplers we had brought. (We grabbed a few extra from Sergio so we could have enough between us to last through the end of the show on Sunday.)

THE TABLE

Table space was more cramped than usual this year. The consensus of the other vendors is that the tables shrunk in comparison to previous years. Still 6 feet long as promised, but they seem narrower, and more tightly packed against the aisles. In previous years, we had room for the display rack, a half-table full of giveaway tracts, and still space for table signs, a candy bowl, and a clipboard for a sign-up sheet. This year… it was more cramped.

The CCAS convention events are first and foremost intended as an outreach ministry, not a fundraising tool, but we still do offer Christian comics for sale so as to offset the costs of the table. We usually end up making at least enough to cover the costs of the table itself, while the hotel and travel costs are just considered out-of-pocket expenses that we volunteers pay as part of our ministry.

cci2010_leakThis year, God blessed us with enough to cover the cost of the table and still had enough left over to cover a hefty chunk of a downpayment for next year’s convention season. In fact, the sales of books were surprisingly good, considering the fact that access to half our table was blocked by a trash can which the convention placed directly in front of us to catch water dripping from a leaky pipe overhead. (We tried to make light of this by posting a sign offering “free baptisms”, but after four days of being unable to have the leak repaired, that had gotten old.)

We got many positive responses from other Christians who were discovering us for the first time, as well as expressions of relief that there were Christians here representing something other than the angry Westboro protesters. Leading up to the show, the attention given to the protesters was wildly disproportionate to their actual impact there. There was just a small handful of them, they protested outside the convention center from behind a police barricade with no direct contact with anyone, and they were there for less than an hour on Thursday afternoon before departing to go picket their next scheduled target. (We had prepared some possible signs to hang at our table as a “disclaimer” in case the protestors outside began to sour the attendees against the rest of us Christians at the show, but thankfully that hostility never materialized.)

cci2010_freesigns

Our table was next to a fellow Christian artist, and across from several other small publishers with whom we struck up friendships and apparently made a very positive impression. The result was that if someone did make a rare complaint about how “awful” it was that “those Christians” had a table at the convention, our neighboring non-religious exhibitors would actually defend us and praise how friendly and helpful we had been to them.

cci2010_table2As always, the CCAS table featured a wide variety of comic-style tracts that we gave away for free to all who would take them. Our tracts included everything from the Street Comix (mini-comics with art produced by CCAS members and published by the Foursquare Missions Press for a street ministry outreach for gang members, prostitutes and the homeless) to classic Jack Chick tracts (but only the ones offering clear Gospel messages, not anti-Catholic conspiracy rants, FYI), as well as free sample booklets showing preview pages from the soon-to-be-released Action Bible.

We carried a very wide mix of comics this year, actually more than we had room to display on our table. Most of it was new: Ralph Miley and I had just produced two new titles through the New Creation Now imprint (Ragged Capes and the New Visions Anthology); Kingstone Media was offering childrens’ titles focusing on Bible stories of Moses, Noah and others; Kurt Kolka brought new copies of The Cardinal; Clint Johnson had a limited edition ashcan preview of Matthew Cross: Faithwalker; Headpress Publishers had released a new installment of the Eyewitness series; and the Voice of the Martyrs had produced a new comic book on overseas persecution, Hope Amid Horror. We also carried older, evergreen titles such as Buzz Dixon’s Serenity manga series, the Proverbs & Parables anthology, and the various “Z” Graphic Novels by Zondervan and Lamp Post Publishing.

THE PANELS

The Saturday morning panel focused on “Spiritual Themes in Comics” and had the following writeup in the convention guide:

11:00-12:00 Spirituality in Comics— How can comics help communicate timeless truths through new media to new audiences? Discuss the latest trends of spiritual themes in comics with moderator Scott Shuford of the Christian Comic Arts Society and panelists Holly Golightly (School Bites), K. J. Kolka (Cardinal Adventures), and Clint Johnson (Faithwalker).

The panel wasn’t bad, but was also smaller than previous years. Scott and the panelists did well, but as for the attendance and audience enthusiasm, those seemed only average. A large part of this was due to our change in venue. Last year, our panel was held inside the convention center, and our room was packed to overflowing. This year, in a smaller room, we had plenty of open seats left. The lights in the room that morning were also so dim as to prevent video recording (although we were able to record the audio of the panel and hope to post it online as a podcast soon.)

cci2010_panel1

Our panel almost got a late start because the previous panelists (a Twilight fan-fiction author fan group?) were slow in ending their session, and their crowds simply moved directly outside the door of the room where their loud continuing conversations in the hallway threatened to drown out our own panelists inside the room. Let’s just say the acoustics of the room were somewhat lacking at that point.

Our scheduled non-Christian panelist (Holly Golightly) was not able to attend the panel; she had told me earlier that there might be a scheduling conflict with events going on at her own booth, and I believe she told Scott that the fact that it was being held outside the convention center also played a factor. We were able to replace her spot on the panel with Brett Burner of Lamp Post Publishing at the last minute. As a result, our Saturday panel lacked the back-and-forth diversity of viewpoints we normally have. Our panelists did great, but having the subject of “Spirituality in Comics” discussed only from a Christian perspective felt like it was lacking something. Personally, I think the Christian POV on the Saturday panel is showcased better when it can be compared and contrasted with other viewpoints. Still, our roster of available panelists are often outside of our control, so we work with whomever God brings us and we trust Him for the results. We’ll see what we can try arranging for next year

The Sunday morning panel with Buzz Dixon, Eric Jansen and Sergio Cariello went better. The convention had fixed the lighting by then, so I was able to record the panel with video as well as audio. (Again, postcasts will be forthcoming, Lord willing.) Also, there was a gap in the scheduling between our panel and the next, which allowed our panel to go long and take up to half an hour of extra time for questions and answers. Here was our official writeup in the guide:

10:00-11:00 Christian Comics: The Word in Pictures— From Andre LeBlanc’s classic Picture Bible to Robert Crumb’s recent adaptation of Genesis, there is a long tradition of Bible-based comics. Moderator Buzz Dixon (Snokie Stories) and panelists Sergio Cariello (The Action Bible) and Eric Jansen (The Christ of Prophecy) discuss the challenges involved in adapting the words of scripture into visual media. A short devotional message will precede the panel discussion, put on by the Christian Comic Arts Society.

Sergio provided an opening devotional about the impact our lives make upon one another, and how even seemingly unimportant artistic efforts (like his freebie contribution to the Proverbs & Parables anthology a decade ago) cause ripples and rebound in unexpected ways (in Sergio’s example, he explained how the art he did for that old anthology ended up putting him in a position where he was chosen to illustrate the new David C. Cook Action Bible, which has been an extensive multi-year project and labor of love for him.)

The panel discussion started off with Sergio’s experience with the Action Bible, and Eric’s experience with his Christ of Prophecy comic produced and distributed worldwide through Foursquare Missions Press. The discussion then widened to include a discussion about the Genesis adaptation of Robert Crumb and other examples of non-Christians creating art based on the Scriptures. We had a very interactive audience, with even staffers from the convention getting involved in the Q&A.

Out of the many other events at the convention that went very well for us, the only event that did not go so well for us was the “After-Hours Mixer”:

7:30-8:30 After Hours with the Christian Comic Arts Society— Creators and fans alike are invited to attend an open meeting of the Christian Comic Arts Society for an informal time of Christian fellowship, networking, laughter and prayer. (Think of it as the social hour after church…just with comic books instead of coffee, cookies and punch.) Room 24ABC

I think there were several reasons this event fizzled. One was the setting: In previous years, we had a relatively small room, but we were free to rearrange the chairs and microphones, which provided a cozy atmosphere of fellowship. This year, we were in a large hall where all the chairs were firmly anchored in rows and even the microphones were bolted down to the floor. We were hoping for the feel of an after-church fellowship hall, and we got a lecture podium with pews instead.

The other problem was the timing. In previous years, our after-hours meeting was relatively ignored by the convention: they gave us an unused room and because there were no further events scheduled, they allowed us to just “hang out” without a set end time. However, with this year’s meeting down the hall from some larger events (the Masquerade, a Kevin Smith panel, etc.), the convention enforced a strict one hour time limit, at the end of which we were ejected and the room locked up tight. End result: we had just enough time for people to make introductions and say “Hi, my name is ___ and I’m a Christian and a comics fan” and… that’s about it. There just wasn’t enough time for much “mixing” to go on at our mixer.

Still, I shouldn’t complain. We had a decent sized turnout for the event, and the fellowship was good even if it was brief. Also, at least now we know better for next year to be more specific with our requests of the convention as to what kind of room we need and how much time to expect. (“And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose.” – Romans 8:28)

cci2010_mixer2

As always, please note that the views and opinions expressed in this blog are those of the author only and do not necessarily represent those of the Christian Comic Arts Society or the other volunteers attending the San Diego Comic-Con.

The annual post-Comic-Con recovery phase

Well, I’m back from the San Diego Comic-Con after five days of volunteer work helping the outreach ministry of the Christian Comic Arts Society, which marked their 15th year participating at the Con.

And as usual, I’m wiped out from the stress of the show, the weekend of sleep deprivation, and catching a cold on the last day of the show. Expect a full report later, but for now — it’s nap time.

Comic-con panels

The San Diego Comic-Con is just around the corner, and once again I’ll be assisting the Christian Comic Arts Society with their ministries there. We’ll have our usual table in the small press section (table #N06) and this year we’ll be involved with three panels. Here’s the info as posted on the convention’s official schedule of events:

  • Saturday, July 24, 2010: 11:00 am – Noon
    Spirituality in Comics:
    How can comics help communicate timeless truths through new media to new audiences? Discuss the latest trends of spiritual themes in comics with moderator Scott Shuford of the Christian Comic Arts Society and panelists Holly Golightly (School Bites), K. J. Kolka (The Cardinal), and Clint Deron Johnson (Faithwalker). Location: Santa Rosa Room, Marriott Hotel and Marina
  • Saturday, July 24, 2010:  7:30-8:30 pm
    After Hours with the Christian Comic Arts Society:
    Creators and fans alike are invited to attend an open meeting of the Christian Comic Arts Society for an informal time of Christian fellowship, networking, laughter and prayer. (Think of it as the social hour after church…just with comic books instead of coffee, cookies and punch.) Location: Room 24ABC
  • Sunday, July 25, 2010: 10:00-11:00 am
    Christian Comics: The Word in Pictures:
    From Andre LeBlanc’s classic Picture Bible to Robert Crumb’s recent adaptation of Genesis, there is a long tradition of Bible-based comics. Moderator Buzz Dixon (Snokie Stories) and panelists Sergio Cariello (The Action Bible) and Eric Jansen (The Christ of Prophecy) discuss the challenges involved in adapting the words of scripture into visual media. A short devotional message will precede the panel discussion, hosted by the Christian Comic Arts Society. Location: Santa Rosa Room, Marriott Hotel and Marina

Saturday, July 24

11:00-12:00 Spirituality in Comics— How can comics help communicate timeless truths through new media to new audiences? Discuss the latest trends of spiritual themes in comics with moderator Scott Shuford of the Christian Comic Arts Society and panelists Holly Golightly (School Bites), K. J. Kolka (Cardinal Adventures), and Clint Johnson (Faithwalker). Santa Rosa Room, Marriott Hotel and Marina
Categories: Comics | Fandom | Seminars & Workshops
7:30-8:30 After Hours with the Christian Comic Arts Society— Creators and fans alike are invited to attend an open meeting of the Christian Comic Arts Society for an informal time of Christian fellowship, networking, laughter and prayer. (Think of it as the social hour after church…just with comic books instead of coffee, cookies and punch.) Room 24ABC
Categories: Comics | Fandom | Nighttime Programming

Sunday, July 25

10:00-11:00 Christian Comics: The Word in Pictures— From Andre LeBlanc’s classic Picture Bible to Robert Crumb’s recent adaptation of Genesis, there is a long tradition of Bible-based comics. Moderator Buzz Dixon (Snokie Stories) and panelists Sergio Cariello (The Action Bible) and Eric Jansen (The Christ of Prophecy) discuss the challenges involved in adapting the words of scripture into visual media. A short devotional message will precede the panel discussion, put on by the Christian Comic Arts Society. Santa Rosa Room, Marriott Hotel and Marina

Space Pony and other projects

Once again, it’s been too long in-between posts here. I’m glad to report that it’s not because I haven’t been writing, but rather because my time has been occupied with my other creative projects: getting the comic book projects from New Creation finished up in time for the San Diego Comic Con in July, as well as setting up the new domain for my Magical Space Pony webcomic. Check it out over at magicalspacepony.com!

What to do with Mary Sue?

Note: I haven’t updated my writing blog for awhile, which may give the impression that I haven’t been doing any writing. The opposite is true, and I’ve been so busy working on private writing projects that I’ve been neglecting to post anything here. So, to get back into the habit of things, here is a recent article on creative writing I wrote for the recent issue #152 of the Alpha-Omega APAzine.

Image of a character admiring herself in a mirror

Mary Sue: Just too perfect?

As I’ve been working on writing a novel, I’ve been pondering what goes in to creating well-rounded, realistic characters. And as I’ve done so, I’ve been forced to confront that poster child of bad characterization: The Mary Sue.

“Mary Sue” is a derogatory term in fandom that has its origins in amateur Star Trek fan fiction, wherein some fans would write stories in which a new Starfleet Officer (who coincidentally resembles the fanfic author) is introduced and immediately outshines all the original cast members and also manages to become the chief love interest of the original cast member who the author coincidently has a crush on. Someone wrote a parody of this kind of fanfiction and labeled the character “Mary Sue”, and the name has stuck ever since.

The term “Mary Sue” has since grown to mean… well, it’s grown to mean just about any character an online reviewer doesn’t like, which renders it useless. But in the more restricted, original sense of the term? What are the traits of the Mary Sue? They can include things like…

…Being a thinly-veiled representation of the author inserting themselves into the story as an act of wish fulfilment. The character of Wesley Crusher in Star Trek the Next Generation is widely cited as an example of a professional, non-fanfiction “Mary Sue”. He seemed clearly to be the favored character of the series creator, nerdy science geek Gene Wesley Roddenberry, in that the nerdy science geek Wesley Crusher was always the unappreciated genius of the show who was always the smartest, always proven right in the end, and he always saved the day in whatever episode he was in.

…Having some sort of uncommon parentage and/or an uncommon visual trait that immediately sets them apart. Perhaps they have purple eyes and a royal birthmark, or are secretly Half-Klingon with a fairy propecy about their birth because they are The Chosen One. Or maybe all of the above.

…They are idealized to the point of being perfect characters. Or, if they do have shortcomings, their “flaws” are either trivial external details (such as clumsiness) or are actually positive traits. (ie—her main problem to overcome in the story is that she’s just too admired, too attractive to people, and has too many friends. Poor Bella Swan Mary Sue.) These Mary Sues either succeed in everything they do, or conversely they die a heroic death to save the day in a blaze of glory and be immortalized as the greatest hero the universe has ever known. They usually have no actual story arc of their own, because the only “challenge” they face in the story is in resolving their temporary external conflicts by their sheer awesomeness.

…if the Mary Sue is part of a larger cast, they upstage all of them. Out of the rest of the ensemble cast, they are the strongest, most talented, most admired, and are the focus of everyone else’s attention. If Mary Sue is not in a scene of the story, then the rest of the cast who are part of the scene will spend their time talking about how much they all miss Mary Sue, and telling the reader why they should too. (Example: This was a major complaint I had when the new Supergirl series was launched under Jeff Loeb. Her early issues were filled with non-stop guest appearances, each of which seemed merely an excuse to tear down the other heroes in order to build up Supergirl in comparison. As she beat up the Teen Titans, the Outsiders, and the Justice League, it wasn’t enough that she has all the powers of Superman–she also had to be shown as faster than the Flash, with more willpower than Green Lantern, etc.)

If you search online, you’ll find all sorts of fan sites offering checklists and multiple choice tests to identify “Mary Sue” characters. However, from my own evaluation of these “Mary Sue Litmus Tests”, I wouldn’t rely on them as a definitive guide–if for no other reason than because a simple summary of stereotyped traits has no way of differentiating from the genuine traits of genuine characters that the stereotypes were built from.

For example, a critic might say “any character is a Mary Sue if they are the strongest or most impossibly talented person the story”. That might sound like a fair rule of thumb. But if you’re writing in the superhero or action-adventure genre, then having your hero be the best of the best is a large part of the appeal. After all, Batman is “the World’s Greatest Detective”, Captain Marvel is “the world’s mightiest mortal”, and “Hulk is strongest one there is!”  The fact that these heroes are larger than life is the reason we’re reading about them!

Another critic might say “a character is automatically a Mary Sue if they physically stand out from a crowd and/or have an uncommon parentage that destines them for greatness“. And again, that can be a handy rule of thumb, as a lot of bad writers use those stereotypical traits as shorthand to avoid the hard work of developing real characters who grow to overcome real challenges. But again, this is also part of the appeal of larger-than-life heroes in the first place. Harry Potter has his scar that immediately marks him as special even among the other wizards. Superman is the last survivor of Krypton and is acknowledged as the greatest hero of the DC Universe. Many of the demigod heroes of classical Greek legend were divinely destined for the fates.

So, this leads us to the all important question: if many of these so-called “Mary Sue” traits can be applied to successful, well-rounded, well-written characters, what exactly is the problem? The problem, like most stereotypes, is a matter of degrees.

The problem isn’t that a character stands out from the crowd, has a unique parentage, or possesses some larger-than-life heroic strength and skill that destines them for greatness. The problem is in how the writer reveals these things, and whether or not the writer is willing to trust the reader to accept them. If the writer plays favorites among the characters, it forces the story to “tell” instead of “show”, and in doing so, the writing disrespects both the characters and the readers. Here’s what I mean…

Playing favorites: It’s usually not a good sign if you can tell that the author has taken an active like or dislike to certain characters. Because when that happens, then the hero doesn’t triumph in the story because they believably strive for it and overcome their obstacles. Instead, the hero wins simply because the writer stacks the deck in their favor. We the readers don’t get to see the hard-fought victory by which the hero earns their achievements. Instead they are granted these achievements as if by mere editorial decree, and things fall into place for no other reason than simply because Mary Sue is just so special.

Telling vs. Showing: Another variation of Mary Sue’s false victories and unearned achievements is to have them imposed via a “ret-conned” backstory. Imagine some new hero who is introduced in a shared-universe story and who is instantly acknowledged as being more logical than Spock, stronger than the Hulk, a better detective than Batman, etc.  Those aren’t attributes that the character has been shown developing over the course of the story for the reader to appreciate or believably accept. Instead, it’s something tacked on by simply “one-upping” the achievements of an existing character.

Not respecting the characters or the readers: by this, I mean the writer doesn’t trust the reader to draw their own conclusion about the events of the story. Instead of showing us Mary Sue performing actions that the reader may interpret as loving or brave, we instead have the rest of the cast stand around and tell us about how loving and brave Mary Sue is. Part of this reluctance to trust the reader is that the author doesn’t want to risk us drawing the “wrong” conclusions about Mary Sue. So instead, we are told what we should feel about her: the characters and the writer’s narration have declared the heroine to be brave, so just accept it!

So, how can you avoid writing the dreaded Mary Sue? There’s no easy fix: over-simplified favorite characters are a temptation most amateur writers must learn to overcome. Focus on well-rounded characterization and on realistic relationships within the cast of supporting characters, to counterbalance any larger-than-life heroic aspects. Most of Mary Sue’s dramatic flaws stem from the fact that their role within the story and among the other characters seems forced and unearned. Be willing to trust your readers enough to get out of the way, and let your story–the plot and the characters–speak for themselves.

WordPress upgrade in progress

This site is temporarily down as we upgrade/reinstall WordPress.

We’ll be back up soon, and (Lord willing) with all our old content restored.

Thanks for your patience.

Update: Well, that wasn’t as bad as I expected. Most the old content was able to be restored. Still sifting through some of it.

A few more layout tweaks, and the blog should be back and ready to go!

Site revamp coming soon

Hi. Just a quick note that this blog has been blindsided by various delays in the past few months. I expect just a little more downtime, as I reinstall a newer version of WordPress and reconfigure the settings.

My scheduling difficulties are a separate matter. Up until recently, I was being kept too busy with overtime at work to spend any time online at home to pursue any personal creative projects like this blog.

And then in March, I was laid off from my job. Yikes!

So now I’ve got nothing but time at home… which I’m spending on job searches rather than blog updates, so the net result for this website hasn’t changed.

Lord willing, I’ll have settled into a new routine by April, and can start finding the right balance of creative projects (blog, novel writing, comic book scripts, etc.) and job search career development. We’ll see!

Please stand by…

Just for anyone wondering, this site isn’t dead. Things have just been in transition lately, with computer upgrades (Woo hoo! Windows 7!), changes in work schedules, and some project juggling between my other duties at New Creation Now and the Christian Comic Arts Society. I’ve got a backlog of material to post; I just need things to quiet down long enough for me to get online for some site management. Lord willing, that’ll be soon.

Recovering from Comic-Con 2009

I spent July 22-26 at the San Diego “Comic-Con International 2009″, helping run the table for the Christian Comic Arts Society. I’m still trying to get my strength back and catch up on the lost sleep from that week!

I’ve got a blog post up about it at the CCAS social network site, but for those who aren’t signed up as part of that network, there’s a copy of my report is also available at the New Creation Now blog as well.